Sunday, September 03, 2006

A dummy coil for guitar

I had this idea since long. Should work well to determine the number of turns of a dummy coil empirically and make other adjustment means like pots unnecessary.


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Hooray for K3



A more detailed diagram of what I'm testing. The little RC hipass network at the master volume pot is to get it more frequency-neutral. Later on, blend pots of smaller resistance. Maybe some ideas borrowed from Keen's Secret Life of Pots too.

I've become aware that if I want to upload more stuff in the future, a few names here and there can be more convenient than referring to "that thing over there". But I'm not so much interested in pondering fantastic names for some spielerei. I'll call this one K3 after a local girlsband.

Went through some more GT-5 patches. Using out-of-phase it's possible to tweak transparant sounding distortion settings and some humbucking ones too. Reminds me a bit of the conversations I saw at Ampage about a pot adjustable dummy coil. I've been thinking about making one.

Sunday, May 28, 2006




I built a test circuit with 3 pickups of 8K each having a 470K log blending pot and a 1n cap. Bridge and neck each have a phase switch. The 500K master volume is inside, while the blend pots were mounted outside the guitar to be able to crocodile some extra stuff to the lugs, or to instantly turn them into shunting pots, by shorting cw lug to wiper. Doing that and using such large pot values, the differences between shunts and dividers become more apparent.

Generally, volume control is spread more evenly over a divider's rotation, while with a shunt smaller value pots are needed for that, and the smaller they are, they eventually affect the pickup's presence, and a tradeoff between presence and even control emerges. I prefer little resonance loss for each pickup alone.

I didn't try the circuit without bypass caps, but they appear to do a good job letting signal through around the pot's resistances. Each pot, combined with it's pickup, has a series resistance of (470 + 8) / 4 = 120K at it's resistive midpoint (which is not the same as the rotation midpoint, since they are log pots). So without caps and with all pots at their resistive midpoint, each pickup signal would have to traverse an additional resistance of 240K. How much the perceived volume loss would be, I don't know, because I didn't test without caps.

That immediately leads to another difference compared to shunts : while with shunts, the combined resistance seen by the next stage can only become smaller while turning them down, the resistance with dividers goes up and then down again. At it's midpoint it totals up to 360K, and that in parallel with the master volume's resistance, is still 200K. Turning master volume down a bit, it peaks to (500 + 360) / 4 = 215K. Regarding hum, a good ground path from the wall supply is the way to stay out of trouble here, as it is with many guitars.

It's nice to have the out-of-phase sounds under control (I like to stay away from boinginess), but there are slight volume drops in the middle of the pots' travel (an exception is the bridge pot), as if the bypass caps weren't there to prevent that. When changing a pot into a shunt by shorting cw lug to wiper, it doesn't go away, it only relocates to a different pot rotation point; the same with adding resistors in parallel over the 1n caps. So I wouldn't say it's inherent to a voltage divider. I guess it's a point where the complicated dance of frequencies phasing each other out is going strongests, and that point isn't necessarily at the end of a pot's travel... Oh well, I am already glad that there is a lot of control available to get usable out-of-phase combinations. Later on I will try pots of somewhat smaller value, and possibly sub the 1n caps with caps-resistor combinations.

This is only a first impression and not a very detailed comparison to a circuit using shunts. I was only testing it for a few hours, into a Boss GT-5. I feel it's a thing you have to learn to know how to use it (I always start setting one pickup at maximum and use one or both of the others to morph a sound). The differences can be very subtle and can easily go lost with too much gain, it's more a thing for clean amp settings. But some out-of-phase combinations can work well with for instance a fuzz (but I suspect going straight into any low input impedance like a Fuzz Face pedal or even a line input will have a bad impact on the blend controls; the GT-5's input is 1M I think, no problem there).

There's no quick way to change from one sound to another (except with the phase switches), and reproducing a sound means memorizing pot combinations, so this thing has a longer learning curve than a thing with switches. My preferred Strat circuit has a bit of both and after this test, it still is.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

What am I doing...


... at the moment? Well, many moons ago I was trying to find an alternative for shunting pots over series pickups, and some spice simulations pointed out that this is worth very much trying.
So right now, I'm building this circuit into one of my Stratocasters. The most important feature to overcome the drawbacks of using voltage dividing pots are the signal pass caps. They work in two ways : as treble bleed caps which needs no further explanation, and they help passing the signal of adjacent pickups around the pot. So much less unwanted interaction between the pots than without those caps is expected.